Update README.md

This commit is contained in:
jeremy rutman 2019-10-19 01:54:42 +03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 680abeb3fb
commit 9095c0cad1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -27,10 +27,15 @@ GED/J d s:++>: a C++(++++) ULU++ P+ L++ E—- W+(-) N+++ o+ K+++ w— O- M
A GEEK CODE BLOCK similar to the output created by the PGP program attempts to universalize how you will see the Geek Code around the net and looks like the following:
BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK—
Version: 3.1
GED/J d s:++>: a C++(++++) ULU++ P+ L++ E—- W+(-) N+++ o+ K+++ w—
O- M+ V PS++>$ PE++>$ Y++ PGP++ t- 5+++ X++ R+++>$ tv+ b+ DI+++ D+++
G+++++ e++ h r y++**
——END GEEK CODE BLOCK——
Special characters
@ -662,53 +667,6 @@ New
Entertainment comics
Hardware
Sex? Whats that? No experience, willing to learn!
Share this:
Press ThisTwitterFacebook
Related
spark gotchas
unicode
uncle jerry's blawg
Edit "Geek Code 4.0 RFC"
Published by jeremyrutman
I'm a patent attorney working in Tel Aviv. I have a PhD in physics from the Technion [Haifa] and originally hail from Texas. View all posts by jeremyrutman
Published
October 17, 2019
Post navigation
Previous Post installing modules for particular version of python
4 thoughts on “Geek Code 4.0 RFC”
Captain Dishwasherman
October 18, 2019 at 2:45 pm Edit
!z
Sex? Whats that? Ive had no sexual experiences.
z?
Its none of your business what my sex life is like (this is used to denote your gender only).
!z+
Seems like these should be z? and z! respectively, not the reverse. And !z+ seems dangling.
How do you have time for all this? You need another category: RFC+++
Like
Reply
jeremyrutman
October 18, 2019 at 5:33 pm Edit
its the holidays here… and RFC is request for comment ?
Like
Reply
Leave a Reply
Blog at WordPress.com.